The pigs burned together with the pig wagon

@ipi**onliberals M113s were given to Ukraine

@TheThing87 the Western world does not have a general policy of open borders. While the European Union’s Schengen Area allows free movement between member nations, external borders are strictly controlled, and many nations are currently increasing, not removing, immigration restrictions and border checks.
Key aspects of border policies in the Western world include:
Schengen Area (Europe): Allows for free movement without internal border checks among 29 European countries. However, this is not "open borders" to the world, as it requires harmonized, tightened external border protection.
Reinstating Checks: Several Schengen nations (e.g., France, Germany) have recently reinstated temporary internal border checks due to security concerns and migration pressures.
Strict External Control: Western nations generally maintain strict immigration laws, visa requirements, and security screenings for non-citizens.
Migration Management: Countries like the UK and US have recently implemented, or planned, tighter policies to restrict unauthorized entry, such as the UK’s Rwanda plan or increased US asylum restrictions.
In summary, "open borders" exist internally within specific agreements like the Schengen area, but Western nations maintain sovereign control over their external borders.

@SugarSlaughter293 So that is why more than 100.000 "refugees" come to Germany alone every year, because we have such strict border control. You realize all these articles are written by, and the AI programmed by Shlomo and comrades, so they will always support the leftwing point of view on immigration? If we had a real border control, we would first warn trespassers not to keep moving, then shoot in the air, and as a last resort, shoot the people trying to cross the border illegally. And we had a good "refugee" policy in the EU until Merkel fcked everything up, refugees had to wait in Greece and other border states in shtty conditions till their asylum application had been reviewed, and then they would be either send back, or had to stay in their respective safe country of arrival. And every leftard who protests against this common sense should be send to a north korean labour camp to have the full dose of socialism.

@TheThing87 I never said YOU had strict border control. Just most of the western world. Of COURSE I meant to exclude the EU I know their borders are open, and I also know that notion’s sorta retarded. bro why did you censor FUCK?! Ooohhh nooooo big bad stinky Jew Commie boogeyman, everyone off the floor!

"If we had a real border control, we would first warn trespassers not to keep moving, then shoot in the air, and as a last resort, shoot the people trying to cross the border illegally." That’s actually really irresponsible. Under international law and the laws of most nations, using deadly force is generally only permitted to protect against an immediate threat to life, NOT for unlawful entry alone.
Law enforcement and border officials are typically restricted to using force only when necessary, often in response to a direct threat to their lives or the lives of others.
Proposals focusing on shooting migrants have been heavily criticized for violating human rights and international law.
Your dogshit scenario outlines a high-risk escalation process (warning, warning shot, lethal shot), which deviates from standard humanitarian and LEGAL border management practices.
Most border strategies prioritize surveillance, physical barriers, and apprehension rather than lethal action against non-combatants.

Second, North Korea is officially a socialist state, describing itself as an "independent socialist State". However, this is obviously bullshit. Observers often classify it as a totalitarian hereditary dictatorship, as its ideology, Juche, has replaced traditional Marxism-Leninism, and its economy relies heavily on informal markets rather than pure state ownership.

Third, I’m not sure Google AI is biased. Believe me, I do have my worries. However, if it was I’m pretty sure it’d say shit like "Yeah uhhhh open borders are very good actually and anyone who thinks otherwise is a far right fascist Nazi.”
But that’s not true, is it? Open borders are in fact bad, I’m with you on that one (surprisingly) for multiple reasons;
nfrastructure and Social Strain: Rapid influxes of people could put immense strain on public services, housing, and infrastructure in receiving nations.
Security Risks: Concerns exist that unrestricted entry could facilitate the movement of criminals or terrorists.
"Brain Drain": Developing countries might lose their most skilled workers, hindering their own development.
Social Cohesion: High levels of immigration over short periods can create challenges for cultural integration and social harmony.
Economic Disruption: While overall global economic output might increase, specific local economies or industries might experience instability or wage pressure in low-skilled sectors.

Now then, I do believe that AT THE TIME (IN 2015) opening German borders was necessary to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe during the peak of the Syrian refugee crisis, which aligned with European values and saved thousands, IF NOT MILLIONS, of lives.
HOWEVER! It shouldn’t have stayed this way, as the current influx has strained infrastructure, increased unemployment among non-nationals, and thus fuelled the rise of right-wing parties across Europe (such as Reform and the AfD).
The decision has indeed often since been seen as breaking the EU’s ability to manage its own borders, with other European states, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe, refusing to follow Germany's approach.
See how I got those downsides from Google AI? Prolly wouldn’t have if it was biased, man, just saying.

Personally what I would’ve done is this; "high wall with a big gate"—meaning secure, controlled borders combined with legal, efficient, and humane immigration pathways! I support a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants already living and working in the Germany, UK or pretty much anywhere in the EU.
Our countries’ resources should be used to increase immigration stations to process asylum seekers quickly and legally, either that or increase enforcement on employers who hire undocumented immigrants.
If anyone DOES somehow get over the wall ILLEGALLY, I will have plainclothesmen spy on them (CIA type shit). If the illegal is peaceful, obeys law, shows good character, etc. we’ll leave them alone, albeit slight pressuring them to officialise their legality. If they’re violent and bad, the plainclothesmen will dress up in their special outfits and deport the fucker!
I support "smart" border security, such as improved technology at ports of entry, increased personnel, and enhanced surveillance drones, rather than a fixed wall.

Listen man, I’m sorry you’re upset, okay? Really I am. But facts don’t care about your feelings.
And the facts tell me that based on available data and analysis, the vast majority of refugees and migrants in Germany live lawfully and peacefully. While concerns about security and crime are frequently debated in German politics and media, the overwhelming majority of the roughly 3.5 million refugees residing in the country are not involved in criminal activity.
Most refugees who arrived in Germany, including the large influx in 2015, are focused on building new lives, learning the language, and securing employment.
While initial integration takes time, a majority of the 2015 cohort had found work after seven years. Many have integrated well, and some have become German citizens.
While refugees are statistically overrepresented in some crime statistics relative to their population size (e.g., around 8.9% of suspects in 2023, while being about 3.5% of the population), experts note this is primarily driven by demographic factors—specifically that the group includes a higher proportion of young males, who are more likely to commit crimes regardless of background.
Many refugees live in challenging conditions, such as temporary shelters with little privacy, which can create social stress. I will condemn them to all of hell if they do violent shit because of it, obviously but while the stress certainly doesn’t EXCUSE, it EXPLAINS.

However, yes, most being peaceful, incidents involving refugees have heightened tensions and contributed to a more polarized atmosphere, with a rise in anti-immigration sentiment and support for right-wing political parties.

Criminality among refugees is a notable issue that politicians have addressed with stricter policies AS IT SHOULD BE, but it is NOT characteristic of the majority of the refugee population, most of whom are seeking safety and stability.

@TheThing87 a liberal anxious Karen ,here

@ipi**onliberals as for you mr., first of all stop pissing on me. Second, I don’t believe I’m a Karen. I had a teaching assistant named Karen, however. She was very kind.
However, yes, I do have Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD). Thanks for the observation, smart Alec